Home | Letter to N.C. State Bar | About Me | Favorite Links | Contact Me
I respectfully dissent

lawlogo2.jpg

My blog and welcome to it.

Random thoughts, ramblings and rants about things legal, illegal, tortious, outrageous and otherwise.

Friday, August 18, 2006

Bullish
 
Some friends' brand new dog
Fri, August 18, 2006 | link

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

83 words that are probably on 90% of the internet
Verizon will block certain words for their subscribers. I'll bet all the blocking Verizon will be doing will get annoying.  And why is the numeral 5 banned?
Tue, August 15, 2006 | link

Tuesday, August 8, 2006

Yet another reason to turn down a request to search
This story is true, mostly.  A man is traveling with his family through North Carolina.  His car is stopped at a license checkpoint and the officer checks the license and then asks for consent.  The man agrees.  In a suitcase the officer finds a bottle of pills.  Since the man was going on vacation he combined his prescription medicines in one unmarked bottle, taking just enough to cover him for the trip.  The officer recognizes that some of the pills are listed as controlled substances and charges the man with possession of controlled substances since he did not have the prescription with him.  I don't necessarily blame the officer since I'm sure he can't take everyone's word for the fact they have a prescription at home.
However look at it from the charged person's perspective.  One Day 1 of vacation his medication has been seized.  Since he is a dentist he may have to report the charge to the licensing board.  He has had to hire an attorney.  He will have to take a day off work and travel to a distant county for the case.  Probably his attorney will be able to present the prescription and get the case dismissed.  But even if that happens, a criminal records check will always show that he was charged with possession of a controlled substance but the case was dismissed.  To get rid of the dismissal record, he will have to go the the extra trouble and expense of getting an expungement.  Since a person is only eligible for one expungement per life, if this ever should happen again he will not be able to get another arrest expunged.  Even if the case is expunged there that just takes the record out of the court system.  It does not remove it from any other database that gobbled up the the court system's data on that day, it also does not require the police department to erase the arrest history.
So even if you are doing nothing wrong, it is not a good idea to agree to a search of anything, period.
Tue, August 8, 2006 | link

Monday, August 7, 2006

I guess it was all that talk about the penal code Mon, August 7, 2006 | link

2009.10.01 | 2008.12.01 | 2008.11.01 | 2008.02.01 | 2007.09.01 | 2007.08.01 | 2007.07.01 | 2007.02.01 | 2007.01.01 | 2006.12.01 | 2006.10.01 | 2006.09.01 | 2006.08.01 | 2006.07.01 | 2006.06.01 | 2006.05.01 | 2006.04.01 | 2006.03.01 | 2006.02.01 | 2006.01.01 | 2005.12.01 | 2005.11.01 | 2005.10.01 | 2005.09.01 | 2005.08.01 | 2005.07.01 | 2005.06.01 | 2005.05.01 | 2005.04.01 | 2005.03.01 | 2005.02.01 | 2005.01.01 | 2004.12.01 | 2004.11.01 | 2004.10.01 | 2004.09.01 | 2004.08.01 | 2004.07.01 | 2004.06.01 | 2004.05.01 | 2004.04.01 | 2004.03.01 | 2004.02.01 | 2004.01.01 | 2003.12.01 | 2003.11.01 | 2003.10.01 | 2003.09.01 | 2003.08.01 | 2003.07.01

North State blogs

Blogs I read:

 
 

< ? law blogs # >

 
 
Meet the blogger at www.attorneygates.com
Got a legal question? www.askthelawguy.info

atlogosm.jpg

mollystella.jpg
Molly and Stella

Terror threat level
 
 Terror Alert Level
Site Meter

Weblog
                           Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

 "The world breaks everyone and afterward many are strong at the broken places.  But those that will not break, it kills.  It kills the very good and the very gentle and the very brave impartially.  If you are none of these you can be sure that it will kill you too but there will be no special hurry."
-Ernest Hemmingway

The Law Guy Thinks Out Loud